Destinations, compared

Synced or sorted: how AI2Fin differs from a tool that pipes your bank feed into a spreadsheet

Both approaches end with rows in a spreadsheet you own. The difference is what has happened to a row on the way — a pipe carries the bank line as your bank wrote it, and Fin reads each transaction first, then delivers the finished row.

How is AI2Fin different from a tool that syncs your bank feed to a spreadsheet?

A pure sync tool moves transactions; AI2Fin reads them and then moves them. The same transaction lands in your spreadsheet either way — as a raw bank line in the first case, and as a categorised, tax-tagged, receipt-linked row in the second.

There are two jobs hidden inside “get my transactions into a spreadsheet”, and this choice is easier once they are pulled apart. Moving a transaction from one place to another is one job, and tools built for it are genuinely good at it. Understanding it — what it was, which category it belongs in, whether it is deductible and under which heading — is a different and much harder one.

Fin does the understanding first and the delivering second, to the same four places a pipe would deliver to. So what you are really choosing between is raw lines you still have to sort, and sorted lines that arrive the same way.

The feature itself — the four destinations, the nine columns, and how a connection is set up — is explained in full on the Destinations overview. This page is only about the comparison.

Bank-feed sync versus AI2Fin, point by point

There are 10 points of comparison below, and 2 of them go the other way. They sit in the table rather than in a footnote, because a comparison whose every row happens to favour the author is not one you should trust.

A tool that pipes a bank feed into a spreadsheet, compared with AI2Fin, across 10 points
What you are comparingA tool that pipes your bank feed to a spreadsheetAI2Fin
What lands in the rowThe bank line as your bank wrote it — a date, a raw description, an amount.The same transaction after Fin has resolved the merchant, chosen a category, worked out the tax treatment and linked the receipt. Nine fields.
Who does the categorisingYou do, in the sheet — usually with keyword rules, a lookup tab or formulas you build and then maintain.Fin does, before the row is sent, from rules you set and intelligent categorisation. Anything unclear is left for you to confirm.
Tax treatmentNot part of the job. The sheet records what you spent; whether it is deductible is a judgement you add later.Travels with the row — deductible or not, and the tax heading it falls under. Left blank where nobody has assessed it yet.
ReceiptsWherever you already keep them.A link in the row to the receipt attached to that transaction.
How current the sheet isUsually closer to live. Reading the account directly, a pipe can put a new line in front of you within hours of it clearing.A daily cadence when a schedule is running, plus an on-demand push whenever you want it sooner.
Which transactions travelEverything the feed carries — a mirror of the account, which is exactly what it is for.The transactions you entered yourself, imported from a CSV or statement, or captured from a receipt.
How the bank connection is madeVaries by tool. Some send you to your bank’s own sign-in; others ask you to type your banking username and password into their screen.You sign in on your bank’s own screen, through the regulated Consumer Data Right. Your banking password is not typed into AI2Fin.
Where the file livesA spreadsheet in your own account.A Google Sheet, Excel workbook, Notion database or Airtable base in your own account — same nine columns whichever you pick.
What you have besides the fileThe spreadsheet is the product, and whatever you build sits on top of it.The spreadsheet is a copy. The dashboard, the reports and the tax view stay in AI2Fin, ready to open rather than built by you.
Slicing it another wayA tab, a pivot or a formula you build — and then maintain as the questions change.Lenses. Read the same transactions by project, client, department, year or a dimension you name, and stack more than one at a time. Included with ELITE+.

Nine columns land in every destination, in the same order, whichever of the four you choose — the full list is on the Destinations overview, and how the sorting itself works is covered on features.

What is a bank-feed sync tool good at?

Carrying rows — quickly, without ceremony, and carrying all of them. If what you want is a mirror of an account inside a sheet you will shape yourself, that is a real need, and a tool built for it will serve you well.

It is worth naming the two places that approach is ahead. It is usually fresher, because it reads the account directly rather than on a schedule. And it carries the whole feed, so a sheet that is meant to be a complete mirror of an account is a job it does and this one does not set out to do. Neither of those is a small thing if it happens to be what you came for.

There is also less to decide. One connection, one sheet, no categories to agree with and nothing to confirm. Simplicity is a feature, and a tool with a single job has more of it than one with two.

AI2Fin is answering a different question. Not “where are my transactions” but “what were they, and which of them count at tax time”. If the sorting is the part that costs you an evening, that is the part worth handing over — and the spreadsheet still turns up at the end of it.

Do you get a dashboard and tax numbers, or only a spreadsheet?

With a pipe, the spreadsheet is the whole product, and a dashboard is something you build inside it. With AI2Fin the spreadsheet is a copy: the dashboard, the reports, the tax view and Lenses stay in AI2Fin, and the file is where the finished rows are delivered.

Lenses are the part worth knowing about, because a spreadsheet reaches for a pivot table at exactly this moment. A lens reads the same sorted transactions along a dimension you choose — a project, a client, a department, a year, or one you name yourself. Which client cost the most to serve. What the workshop spent this quarter against last. Which job is carrying the travel. You can apply more than one at a time, so “this client, this financial year” is one view rather than a new tab you build and then keep up to date.

Worth being precise about how the two halves meet: Lenses shape what you see inside AI2Fin, and a destination push delivers the finished rows themselves. Each row arrives carrying its category and its tax treatment, so a slice you want in the sheet is a filter or a pivot you make there — on data that has already been sorted for you.

Lenses arrive with ELITE+, the same plan that carries Outbound Destinations, so the analysis and the delivery turn up together — what each plan covers is set out on pricing.

Which one updates your spreadsheet sooner?

A feed-driven pipe usually does, and that is worth saying plainly. Fin can keep a destination updated on a schedule — a daily cadence — and you can push on demand at any time, which closes the gap whenever you need it closed.

A daily rhythm suits the shape of this work. Categorised, tax-tagged rows are something you sit down with — at a BAS deadline, at a handover to an accountant, at the end of a quarter — rather than something you refresh between meetings. It also keeps your own provider’s usage limits comfortable, which matters more than it sounds when the file is one you will keep for years.

And the on-demand push is there for the evening before a deadline, when tomorrow is not soon enough. So the honest version of this trade is: if minute-by-minute freshness is the thing you are optimising for, a pipe wired straight to a feed gets you there sooner. If a finished set of rows waiting for you each morning is worth more than a raw one arriving faster, that is the trade this page is really about.

What has to be connected, and what gets sent onward?

Two connections do the work: your bank at one end, your spreadsheet at the other, and both sign-ins happen on the provider’s own screen. What Fin sends onward is the transactions you entered yourself, imported from a CSV or statement, or captured from a receipt.

The password question is the one people ask first, and it is a fair one to put to anything in this space. The category does not answer it for you — some tools that carry bank data send you to your bank’s own sign-in, and others still ask you to type your banking username and password into a screen that is not your bank’s — so it is worth checking per tool rather than assuming either way. With AI2Fin it is settled by the mechanism: bank connections run through the regulated Consumer Data Right, which means you sign in with your bank rather than handing a password to an app.

The same shape holds at the other end. Connecting Google Sheets, Excel, Notion or Airtable happens on that provider’s own authorisation screen, and what you grant there is narrow by design — revocable from your own account settings, without going through AI2Fin.

How open-banking data is collected, kept and deleted is set out in full in the Consumer Data Right policy, and what travels to a destination is covered on the Destinations overview.

Which one fits the way you work?

If you want a mirror of an account inside a sheet you will shape yourself, a tool built to carry rows is the shorter path. If the sorting is the part that costs you time, start at the other end and let the finished rows arrive.

A plain pipe suits you if…

…you want every line from an account mirrored into a sheet, you enjoy building your own categories and formulas, you want the file as current as the feed allows, and what you are tracking is day-to-day spending rather than a tax position.

AI2Fin suits you if…

…the categorising is the evening you would like back, deductibility and receipts matter to you by the end of the year, you hand a file to an accountant or bookkeeper, and you want the same nine columns landing in the same order every month.

The four destinations are not identical, and the differences are real enough to be worth a page each — Google Sheets, Excel, Notion and Airtable. Outbound Destinations is included on the ELITE+ and AUTO+ plans; see what each plan covers.

The comparison, answered

Common questions about syncing versus sorting

When is a plain bank-feed sync the better choice for you?
When what you want is a mirror. If the job is to have every line from an account appear in a sheet you will shape yourself — your own categories, your own formulas, your own tabs — then a tool built to carry rows is the shorter path, and it will do that job well. It is also the better fit when you want the sheet as current as the feed allows, and when what you are tracking is personal spending rather than a tax position. AI2Fin is built for the other half of the problem: working out what each transaction was and whether it counts at tax time, and then delivering the finished row.
Which gets your spreadsheet updated sooner — a bank-feed sync or AI2Fin?
A feed-driven pipe usually does, and that is worth saying plainly. It reads the account directly, so a new line can reach your sheet within hours of clearing. Fin can keep a destination updated on a schedule — a daily cadence — and you can push on demand at any time, which closes the gap whenever you need it closed. The daily rhythm suits what these rows are for: categorised, tax-tagged transactions are something you read at a deadline or a handover rather than refresh between meetings.
Do bank-feed sync tools categorise and tax-tag transactions for you?
Most give you the tools to do it yourself, which is a real and useful thing to be given. Keyword rules, a lookup tab, a category column you fill in — all of it works, and plenty of people enjoy building it. What changes with AI2Fin is who does the work: Fin resolves the merchant, chooses a category, works out whether the transaction is deductible and under which tax heading, and links the receipt, all before the row is sent. Anything it is unsure of is left for you to confirm rather than guessed at.
Does a bank-feed sync tool give you an expense dashboard or work out your tax?
Usually not, and it is not setting out to — the sheet is the product, and a dashboard is something you build inside it once the rows are there. AI2Fin starts from the other end. The same transactions sit in a dashboard, in reports, in a tax view carrying what is deductible and under which heading, and in Lenses, where you can read them by project, client, department or year. The spreadsheet is then a copy of the finished rows, delivered to a file you own.
What happens to a row after you have edited it in your spreadsheet?
It stays as you left it. New transactions are added beneath what is already there, so a category you corrected, a note you added in a column of your own, or a formula you wrote alongside the row keeps working. This is the practical difference between a delivery and a rewrite: Fin adds finished rows to the end of your file rather than re-writing the file to match its own copy, so the sheet remains yours to work in.
Can you run a bank-feed sync tool and AI2Fin at the same time?
Yes, and for some people that is a sensible arrangement — a live mirror of an account in one sheet for day-to-day visibility, and a categorised, tax-tagged file from AI2Fin for the work that happens at a deadline. They are answering different questions, so they do not have to compete for the same tab. Send them to separate files rather than the same one, and each stays readable on its own terms.

Sorted first, then delivered

Getting your transactions read and categorised is the free part. Turn on a destination when you want the finished rows arriving in your own spreadsheet without you opening anything.

Get 2Fin free